e val Bringing evaluation theory and practice closer together

Skip to content.

Evaluate Europe

Sections
You are here: Home » Other Projects

Evaluate Europe projects

This area of the Evalaute-Europe web site provides working spaces for different European projects researching and developing ideas and products about evaluation. If you would like your project to have a space on the site please contact us.

The projects


The site currently is host to four projects: E-val 2, the Capitalisation and Evaluation Network (CERN), E-val 3 and Eval-4 TESTSCAN. All the projects have recieved funding from the European Commission Leonardo da vinci Programme. Although the funding for E-val 2 ended in December 2002, development work on the products continues. The CERN network funding ended in November 2003, but the partners are planning to continue with the network.

E-val 2 is invloved in the development of ICT based tools for evaluation.

The CERN network is undertaking research into evalaution and developing handbooks and training programmes for evaluators.

E-val 3 is examining the evaluation of e-learning.

More details of the three projects can be found in project folders.

Whilst the projects are undertaking different activities they share a common underpinning ethos. We are committed to:

  • Evaluation as an essential element in the design and planning of any project, programme or innovative process.
  • Evaluation that is integral to programme activities and not `bolted-on’.
  • Evaluation that spans the whole lifecycle of a programme and which is formative as well as summative.
  • Evaluation that is client centred, based on a non-dependency relationship and leading to long-term client autonomy and sustainability.
  • Evaluation that recognises the diversity of stakeholders and responds to their different needs by offering a wide range of evaluation products, tools and processes.
  • Evaluation as a skilled intervention and a specialist field of knowledge and practice.
  • Evaluation that is ethical, professional and responsible.
  • Evaluation which is informed by a range of different approaches and theoretical perspectives to ensure congruence between the evaluation process and the policies, processes and practices being evaluated.

Created by admin
Last modified 2005-05-05 09:39 AM
 

Powered by Plone

This site conforms to the following standards: